“Allah is not obliged to
be fair about all the things he does here on earth” says Birahima, before and
after narrating a story that sees him end up a child soldier in multiple warring
factions, brush with death repeatedly, and on at least one occasion, become a
victim of sexual assault. It is his refrain throughout the book titled “Allah
is not obliged”. The narrative is not particularly religiously inclined. The disinterested
‘Allah’ could just as well be another. What does it matter when referring to
their lack of obligation anyway. The reason for this rationalization about Allah
is self-evident in the novel. A benevolent god might look out for you, a cruel
one might punish you in particular. But it is an indifferent, ‘un-obliged’ god
that just lets life happen to you, and lets people hack each other to death without
consequence.
The narrative is
peppered with a number of refrains that Birahima keeps saying, evocative,
almost, of ‘Brutus is an honourable man’. One is also reminded of Holden
Caulfield at times during the novel, but Birahima’s sardonic resignation is graver
and more total. He has witnessed (and presumable partaken in) incredible cruelty.
He refers to himself as both blameless and beyond redemption. Almost everything
he deals with is not something a child his age should be encumbered with. But
Allah is not obliged to be fair about these things.
I remember a quote from
The Stranger about man being able to get used to anything. It might be
something Mersault remembers his mother saying in prison. I have also seen a
similar sentiment attributed to Dostoyevsky, maybe from the House of the Dead.
They are right. Man can come to terms with anything. Like that meme of a guy visiting
a girl’s apartment for the first time and remarking “damn b****, you live like
this?”
During Christmas 2023,
I was part of a small group of students ‘stuck’ in Leiden while everyone went away
on holiday. We were shown around frat houses in the city by someone from the
University’s well-being team; she happened to be a frat-house veteran herself. One
of the party halls we entered was nearly impossible to breathe in owing to stench
of beer on old wood. By her account, the odour had had over a century to take
shape. While everyone on the tour turned into temporary mouth-breathers, our
guide continued her narration unfazed. “I don’t smell anything out of the ordinary,
to be honest”, she said. She was used to it. You can get used to anything.
In this city that is
polluted like no other place in human history, people have the habit of sitting
around log fires in the evening. The smell of incomplete combustion spreads in
every direction, worsening conditions in a city already choking from the smoke.
My solution is to shut every orifice and sit next to the air purifier, but
people spend all evening sitting by that fire. You get used to anything.
Birahima mourns specific
events in his ordeal. There are deaths that make him cry, other cruelties that
make him feel pain. Finding out about the passing of his aunt – one he never
met – brings him to tears. But he does not lament his general fate. Perhaps he does
not know to; he has not acquired the vocabulary to express discontent at the
fact that life is unavailable to him. He does not know to mind how unfairly
life treats him. But is he unaware of the unfairness? If Allah is described as not
obliged to be fair, it is because Birahima perceives unfairness. It is because
he cannot explain to himself why blameless fearless Birahima falls from
misfortune to misfortune. This is, nevertheless, a quickness in accepting his
fate that cannot be expected of adults harbouring hopes and dreams.
I spent most of reading
time at the back end of last year on Dostyevsky. It was motivated for the most
part by that Baldwin quote about how Dostoyevsky makes you realise the things
you are going through today are not that different from what people were
suffering a hundred years ago. “This is a very great liberation for the
suffering, struggling person, who always thinks that he is alone. This is why
art is important,” says Baldwin. As someone who lives through life expecting
and treating most unwelcome experiences (and they are mostly unwelcome
experiences) as penance, I found myself relating deeply with Dostoyevsky’s
characters. As one of the last great conservative intellectuals, it is very
clear from his protagonists that his idea of how one might live is inextricable
from suffering. This suffering often appears to be in service of a calling
greater than oneself, but I think one could be forgiven for thinking Prince
Myshkin believes meaning inheres in suffering. He certainly thought himself
obliged to suffer. I would argue he thought it increased his virtue. And he
(not unlike myself), would be unable to articulate why so much penance was due.
What made him start from a diminished sense of self-worth? I think I can answer
for myself; I can theorize, at least. I am a collection of ‘lesser than’
identities. Whenever I am Indian, I am punished for it. Whenever I am Muslim, I
am punished for it. Whenever I am Muslim in India, I am punished beyond measure
for it. A name and papers that will follow me without my ever having asked for
them. But Allah is not obliged to be fair about everything, and to quote poor
Birahima “The same goes for me. I’m not obliged to tell my dog’s-life-story. So
I’m going to stop for today.”